Legal Opinion

Harvey v. City of Oklahoma City

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 29, 2005No. 101,332PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtColbert, J.

¶ 1 The City of Oklahoma City (City), together with the Oklahoma City Urban Renewal Authority and the Oklahoma City Redevelopment Authority, desire to redevelop the Skirvin Hotel in downtown Oklahoma City. On May 7, 2004, the City adopted a Resolution “approving in principle a funding plan for the Skirvin Hotel Project.” In this Resolution, the City noted the Skirvin Hotel, which closed its door for business in 1988, is “one of the most historic buildings in Oklahoma City [and] should not be abandoned and demolished, but instead salvaged and restored to some productive use.” The redevelopment…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In Re the Oklahoma Capitol Improvement AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
  2. Oklahoma City Urban Renewal Authority v. Medical Technology & Research AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2000
  3. Atlantic Richfield Co. v. State Ex Rel. Wildlife Conservation CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1983
  4. City of Guymon v. ButlerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2004
  5. In Re Application of Oklahoma Development Finance Auth.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2004

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Curry v. StreaterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2009
  2. Steidley v. Community Newspaper HoldIngs, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2016
  3. Emery v. Central Oklahoma Health CareSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007
  4. HICKS v. CENTRAL OKLAHOMA UNITED METHODIST RETIREMENT FACILITYCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2016
  5. Simic v. State ex rel. Department of Public SafetyCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2005

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API