Legal Opinion
City of Broken Arrow v. Bass Pro Outdoor World, L.L.C.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided January 19, 2011No. 104,015PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtEdmondson, J.
€ 1 This case involves an attempt by a gul tam taxpayer to intervene in a declaratory judgment action which was brought by officials in response to the gut tam demand and notice. The taxpayer challenged the City's expenditure of funds for an economic development project which involved construction and location of a sporting goods store, Bass Pro, in the City of Broken Arrow. The construction had been completed and Bass Pro operating the business for approximately ten months at the time of the hearing in the trial court on Taxpayer's motion to intervene and City's motion for summary judgment.…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Reeds v. WalkerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006
- State Ex Rel. Tal v. City of Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
- Lawrence v. Cleveland County Home Loan AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981
- State Ex Rel. Trimble v. City of MooreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991
- In Re the Oklahoma Capitol Improvement AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- State ex rel. Board of Regents ex rel. Campus Disciplinary Council v. LucasSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2013
- INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT 52 v. HOFMEISTERSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2020
- Tulsa Industrial Authority v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2011
- Andrew v. Depani-SparkesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2017
- STATE ex rel. OKLA. STATE BD. OF MEDICAL LICENSURE AND SUPERVISION v. RIVEROSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2021
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.