Legal Opinion

Stickney v. Goward

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 16, 1925No. 24,409PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.

In 1889 William E. Stickney became a member of the Modern Woodmen, receiving a certificate under which his wife, plaintiff, was to receive $2,000 upon his death. The certificate remained in the possession of plaintiff until her husband’s death in January, 1920. A few years before his death, and while an inmate of the Minnesota Soldiers’ Home, there was issued to him another certificate, naming his and plaintiff’s three children beneficiaries instead of plaintiff. Both the widow and children presented proofs of death and demanded the insurance. Plaintiff brought suit against the insurer. By…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Inhabitants of Westfield v. MayoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1877
  2. McGaw v. Acker, Merrall & Condit Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1909
  3. First National Bank v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1901
  4. Curtley v. Security Savings SocietyWashington Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Bergquist v. KreidlerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Ritter v. RitterIllinois Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Morrison v. SwensonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
  3. L & H AIRCO, INC. v. Rapistan Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  4. Cohen v. American Home Assurance Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1969
  5. Turner v. Zip Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1954

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API