Legal Opinion

Turner v. Zip Motors, Inc.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided July 26, 1954No. 48508PublishedCited by 65 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.

— The instant case is an outgrowth of A. C. Nelsen Auto Sales, Inc. v. Turner, 241 Iowa 927, 44 N.W.2d 36, a replevin action in which the plaintiff, an Omaha automobile sales agency, claimed the right to possession of a Packard car from the defendant, Turner, who is the plaintiff in the action now before us. Turner successfully defended the replevin suit both in the trial court and this court. He now alleges that the litigation was brought about by the wrongful conversion of the automobile, which was at all times his property, by the defendant, Zip Motors, Inc., acting through its agent, one…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Grismore v. Consolidated Products Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1942
  2. Inhabitants of Westfield v. MayoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1877
  3. Kuiken v. GarrettSupreme Court of Iowa · 1952
  4. Stiles v. Municipal CouncilMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1919
  5. McGaw v. Acker, Merrall & Condit Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1909

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by65 opinions

  1. Graham v. WorthingtonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1966
  2. Peters v. LyonsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1969
  3. Vallejos v. C. E. Glass Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1978
  4. Elyse De Stefano v. Apts. Downtown, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2016
  5. Kimmel v. Iowa Realty Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1983

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API