L & H AIRCO, INC. v. Rapistan Corp.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
KEITH, Justice.
We accelerated review of an order of the district court denying the defendants’ separate motions for summary judgment and certifying as important and doubtful questions relating to arbitral immunity and an attorney’s potential tort liability. We affirm in part and reverse in part.
Rapistan Corporation, the successor by merger to Lear Siegler, Inc., Mammoth Division (hereafter collectively designated as “Rapistan”), is engaged in the manufacture and sale of heating, ventilating and air-conditioning equipment. It entered an agreement in 1980 which designated L & H Aireo, Inc. as…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Green Spring Farms v. KerstenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
- Commonwealth Coatings Corp. v. Continental Casualty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Friedman v. DozorcMichigan Supreme Court · 1981
- Florenzano v. OlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- Klein v. First Edina National BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by79 opinions
- McCamish, Martin, Brown & Loeffler v. F.E. Appling InterestsTexas Supreme Court · 1999
- Noble Systems Corp. v. Alorica Central, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
- M.H. v. Caritas Family ServicesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
- Kevin Murphy v. Aurora Loan ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012
- Witzman v. Lehrman, Lehrman & FlomSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.