King v. Pony Gold Mining Co.
Montana Supreme Court
On Motion to Dismiss Appeals. Action by Rockwell King against the Pony Gold-Mining Company and others. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendants Henry Elling and another appeal. Plaintiff moves to dismiss appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Pigott
1. Elling and Morris, who were impleaded as co-defendants with the Pony Gold-Mining Company and Hauser, have appealed from a judgment against them and an order denying their motion for a new trial. In July last the respondent moved that the appeals be dismissed. Upon the denial of the motion, leave was granted to renew it upon grounds other than those contained in the first motion, and thereupon the respondent filed the motion now before the court. The grounds of the present motion existed and were known to the respondent when he filed the original motion to dismiss, and no reason is…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Clark's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1900
- Pierse v. MilesMontana Supreme Court · 1885
- Ney v. OrrMontana Supreme Court · 1877
- Cramer v. TittleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Hurd v. Hannibal & St. Joseph RailroadNew York Supreme Court · 1884
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Spokane Grain & Fuel Co. v. LyttakerWashington Supreme Court · 1910
- Spratt v. Helena Power Transmission Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1908
- State v. ArmstrongNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1924
- State Ex Rel. Normile v. CooneyMontana Supreme Court · 1935
- Marioneaux v. CutlerUtah Supreme Court · 1907
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.