Legal Opinion
Montgomery Ward & Co. v. United States
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided June 27, 1974No. 74-7, C.A.D. 1131PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Kich, Judge.
This appeal is from the decision and judgment of the United States Customs Court, 70 Cust. Ct. 193, C.D. 4430, 362 F. Supp. 560 (1973), which dismissed an action challenging the classification of certain portions of an electronic organ as an electronic musical instrument, “Other,” under TSUS 725.47 and claiming classification under TSUS 726.80 as “Musical instrument parts not specially provided for.” We reverse.
*102The four articles imported were: (1) a bass foot pedal assembly; (2) a keyboard chassis assembly; (3) an amplifier and expansion pedal assembly; and (4) a reverberation…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In re GruschwitzCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963
- Application of Carl Arnold and Heinrich BrandtCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963
- Application of Alleyne C. Howell, JrCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1962
- Montgomery Ward & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1973
3Cited by13 opinions
- Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company v. Chemque, Inc. (Formerly Known as Chemque Canada, Ltd.) and Thomas & Betts Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- Solder Removal Co. v. United States International Trade CommissionCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1978
- United States v. SillsCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2002
- Casio, Inc., Plaintiff/cross-Appellant v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- United States v. WashingtonUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2001
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.