Legal Opinion

United States v. Sills

Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces

Decided January 15, 2002No. 02-0048/AFPublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Per curiam

In its review of appellant’s case under Article 66, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 866, the Court of Criminal Appeals set aside one of the specifications of which appellant was convicted. United States v. Sills, 56 MJ 556, 563, 572 (A.F.Ct.Crim.App.2001). The court then turned to consider whether it “may reassess the sentence, or whether it must order a rehearing on the sentence.” Id. at 568. Citing Jackson v. Taylor, 353 U.S. 569, 77 S.Ct. 1027, 1 L.Ed.2d 1045 (1957), the court concluded that it lacked the authority to order a rehearing on sentence. Id. at 571, 77 S.Ct. 1027. The…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Payne v. TennesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. United States v. TurnerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987
  3. Jackson v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. United States v. BooneCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1998
  5. United States v. MillerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1959

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. United States v. WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2002
  2. United States v. NeradCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2010
  3. United States v. GaskinsCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2013
  4. United States v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2003
  5. United States v. QuickCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2015

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API