Application of Carl Arnold and Heinrich Brandt
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
MARTIN, Judge.
This is an appeal from the decision of the Board of Appeals of the Patent Office affirming the Primary Examiner’s rejection of claims 18 through 28, the only remaining claims, of appellants’ application for a patent on a process for producing a welding flux product. Some question has arisen as to the sufficiency of the reasons of appeal in this case.
We shall dispose of this matter before discussing the merits of the appeal. The reasons of appeal are as follows:
1. It was error to affirm the decision of the Examiner in his rejection of claims 18 to 28.
2. It was error to refuse to…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Application of Alleyne C. Howell, JrCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1962
- In re DichterCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1940
- In re KopplinCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1945
3Cited by12 opinions
- Application of Walter Spormann and Joachim HeinkeCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1966
- In re GruschwitzCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963
- Montgomery Ward & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1974
- In re CastnerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1975
- Application of Erich Timmerbeil, Hugo Timmerbell and Paul TimmerbeilCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.