Legal Opinion
Casio, Inc., Plaintiff/cross-Appellant v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided January 16, 1996No. 95-1099, 95-1111PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MICHEL, Circuit Judge.
The United States appeals the decision'of the United States Court of International Trade, No. 89-07-00385, reclassifying 5 of 38 electronic musical synthesizer models, imported by Casio, Inc. (“Casio”), as “electrical articles which produce sound,” Tariff Schedules of the United States (“TSUS”) 1 688.34, as opposed to their original classification as “electronic musical instruments,” TSUS 725.47. Casio cross-appeals the court’s determination that the remaining models of imported electronic musical synthesizers were properly classified as “electronic musical instruments.”…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- South Corporation and Seal Fleet, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1982
- Stewart-Warner Corporation v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Marcel Watch Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
- Nidec Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Daisy-Heddon v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1979
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Bausch & Lomb, Incorporated v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- CamelBak Products, LLC v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
- La Crosse Technology, Ltd. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
- R.T. Foods, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
- Grk Canada, Ltd. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.