United States v. Washington
United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
YOUNG, Chief Judge:
Court members sentenced the appellant to a bad-conduct discharge and confinement for 2 months after convicting him of willful dis*938obedience of a superior commissioned officer’s order to be inoculated with anthrax vaccine. Article 90, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 890. The appellant has assigned five errors: (1) The military judge erred in precluding the defense from presenting the affirmative defenses of duress and necessity; (2) The appellant’s conviction is legally and factually insufficient; (3) The military judge erred by denying the appellant sentencing credit…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Herrera v. CollinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Church of the Holy Trinity v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- United States v. BaileySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States v. TurnerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- United States v. WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2002
- United States v. SillsCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2002
- United States v. NazarioUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2001
- United States v. SillsUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2001
- United States v. SillsUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2002
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.