Legal Opinion

Martin v. Ohio

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 20, 1987No. 85-6461PublishedCited by 478 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice White

The Ohio Code provides that “[e]very person accused of an offense is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, and the burden of proof for all elements of the offense is upon the prosecution. The burden of going forward with the evidence of an affirmative defense, and the burden of proof by a preponderance of the evidence, for an affirmative defense, is upon the accused.” Ohio Rev. Code Ann. §2901.05(A)(1982). An affirmative defense is one involving “an excuse or justification peculiarly within the knowledge of the accused, on which he can fairly be required to adduce…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Patterson v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Leland v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  4. Rivera v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. State v. MartinOhio Supreme Court · 1986

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by478 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Walton v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Schad v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Medina v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. Montana v. EgelhoffSupreme Court of the United States · 1996

473 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API