Legal Opinion

People v. Monge

California Supreme Court

Decided August 27, 1997No. S055881PublishedCited by 102 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CHIN, J.

In this case, we consider the applicability of the state and federal prohibitions against double jeopardy to a proceeding to determine the truth of a prior conviction allegation, We conclude that, in this noncapital case, the state and federal prohibitions against double jeopardy do not apply. Accordingly, we reverse the judgment of the Court of Appeal to the extent that judgment bars retrial of the prior conviction allegation on double jeopardy grounds.

Facts and Procedural Background

During the afternoon of January 25, 1995, as Pomona Police Department undercover officers were…

2Cases cited65 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Furman v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by102 opinions

  1. Monge v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  2. People v. BarraganCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  3. People v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
  4. People v. MosbyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  5. People v. HansonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000

97 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API