Legal Opinion

State v. Wright

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 24, 1992No. DC 90D-106823; CA A68328; SC S39281PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*126GRABER, J.

We decide two questions in this case. (1) In ruling on a pretrial motion to suppress evidence in a criminal case, based on an allegedly illegal search or seizure, is a trial court bound by the rules of evidence relating to the admissibility of hearsay? We answer that question “no.” (2) Was an out-of-court statement that an officer “observed” defendant, who was driving, to be “very visibly intoxicated” sufficient to allow a reasonable trier of fact to conclude that the officer had a reasonable suspicion that defendant was driving under the influence of intoxicants in violation of a…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. CarlsonOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  2. State Ex Rel. Juvenile Department v. AshleyOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Guedon v. RooneyOregon Supreme Court · 1938
  4. State v. LichtyOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Porter v. HillOregon Supreme Court · 1992

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. State v. FergusonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  2. State v. JamesOregon Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Matoumba v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
  4. State v. DavisOregon Supreme Court · 2011
  5. State v. DelongOregon Supreme Court · 2015

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API