State v. Wright
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
*126GRABER, J.
We decide two questions in this case. (1) In ruling on a pretrial motion to suppress evidence in a criminal case, based on an allegedly illegal search or seizure, is a trial court bound by the rules of evidence relating to the admissibility of hearsay? We answer that question “no.” (2) Was an out-of-court statement that an officer “observed” defendant, who was driving, to be “very visibly intoxicated” sufficient to allow a reasonable trier of fact to conclude that the officer had a reasonable suspicion that defendant was driving under the influence of intoxicants in violation of a…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. CarlsonOregon Supreme Court · 1991
- State Ex Rel. Juvenile Department v. AshleyOregon Supreme Court · 1991
- Guedon v. RooneyOregon Supreme Court · 1938
- State v. LichtyOregon Supreme Court · 1992
- Porter v. HillOregon Supreme Court · 1992
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- State v. FergusonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
- State v. JamesOregon Supreme Court · 2005
- Matoumba v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
- State v. DavisOregon Supreme Court · 2011
- State v. DelongOregon Supreme Court · 2015
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.