State v. Delong
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
*367KISTLER, J.
During a traffic stop, a deputy sheriff placed defendant in custody and then asked him, without first advising him of his Miranda rights, “if there was anything we should be concerned about” in his car. Defendant “told [the deputy] ‘no,’ and that if we wanted to search the vehicle, we could.” On appeal, the state conceded that the deputy violated Article I, section 12, of the Oregon Constitution when he asked defendant that question without first advising him of his Miranda rights. The state argued, however, that the physical evidence that the deputies later found in defendant’s…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Oregon v. ElstadSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Dickerson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Missouri v. SeibertSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- United States v. PataneSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- State v. SwanOregon Supreme Court · 2018
- State v. Heise-FayCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
- State v. BeesonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
- State v. DelongCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
- State v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.