Legal Opinion

Matoumba v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided January 12, 2006No. 47, September Term, 2005PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRaker, J.

The question presented in this case is whether a police officer, testifying at a suppression hearing, is required to be qualified as an expert witness regarding facts that gave rise to a reasonable suspicion justifying a stop and frisk of a suspect. We shall answer that question in the negative and affirm.

I

Kobie Matoumba, petitioner, was convicted in a bench trial in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City of the offense of possession of a handgun by a person previously convicted of a crime of violence. He filed a motion to suppress the handgun the police seized from him following a traffic…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. United States v. RaddatzSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. United States v. MatlockSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Dickerson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. United States v. Bonifacio De La Fuente, Ronald Albert Cardenas, George Sierra, Pat Vargas,augie D. Sierra, and Robert StewartCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Stone v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2008
  2. Sellman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2016
  3. McDowell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2009
  4. Smith v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2008
  5. Bartlett v. Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLCCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2014

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API