Matoumba v. State
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the CourtRaker, J.
The question presented in this case is whether a police officer, testifying at a suppression hearing, is required to be qualified as an expert witness regarding facts that gave rise to a reasonable suspicion justifying a stop and frisk of a suspect. We shall answer that question in the negative and affirm.
I
Kobie Matoumba, petitioner, was convicted in a bench trial in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City of the offense of possession of a handgun by a person previously convicted of a crime of violence. He filed a motion to suppress the handgun the police seized from him following a traffic…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- United States v. RaddatzSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States v. MatlockSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Dickerson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. Bonifacio De La Fuente, Ronald Albert Cardenas, George Sierra, Pat Vargas,augie D. Sierra, and Robert StewartCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Stone v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2008
- Sellman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2016
- McDowell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2009
- Smith v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2008
- Bartlett v. Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLCCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2014
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.