Legal Opinion
State v. Ferguson
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided August 17, 2005No. 000666FE; A116493PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtOrtega, J.
The state petitions for reconsideration of our decision in State v. Ferguson, 197 Or App 384, 105 P3d 872 (2005), on the ground that it is in conflict with statements made in two prior opinions of this court: State v. Williams, 161 Or App 111, 984 P2d 312 (1999), and State v. Sulser, 127 Or App 45, 871 P2d 126 (1994). Our decision in Ferguson holds that the state invited error when, after losing a suppression motion, the state advised the trial court to dismiss the charges against defendant pursuant to ORS 136.120. Ferguson, 197 Or App at 389-90. As explained below, we adhere to our analysis,…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- State v. KoenneckeOregon Supreme Court · 1976
- State v. ShawOregon Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. HoareCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975
- Anderson v. Oregon RailroadOregon Supreme Court · 1904
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- State v. KammeyerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
- State v. BergCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
- State v. ReevesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
- Ossanna v. Nike, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
- State v. FultsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.