Legal Opinion

Gumm v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 28, 2008PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Judge SIMPSON.

In these workers’ compensation appeals, Chris Gumm (Claimant) petitions for review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Board) insofar as it reversed an award of a penalty and unreasonable contest attorney fees against J. Allan Steel Company, and its workers’ compensation carrier, Old Republic Insurance Services (collectively, Employer). Claimant asserts Employer’s failure to file an appropriate document accepting his work injury as compensable constituted an unreasonable contest of his claim petition and violated the Workers’ Compensation Act (Act). 1

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Daniels v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  2. Dorsey v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  3. Waldameer Park, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  4. Minicozzi v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  5. Shuster v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2000

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Amandeo v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  2. Bemis v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  3. Dixon v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  4. Baumann v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  5. Pennsylvania Bankers Ass'n v. Pennsylvania Department of BankingCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2009

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API