Legal Opinion

Penczkowski v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 22, 1986No. Appeal, 3481 C.D. 1984PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Palladino,

This is an appeal by Edward Penczkowski (Claimant) from an order of the Workmens Compensation Appeal Board (Board) affirming a referees decision which denied a modification petition presented by Foster Wheeler Energy Corporation (Employer) but declined to award attorneys fees to Claimant pursuant to Section 440 of The Pennsylvania Workmens Compensation Act (Section 440). Claimant is appealing only the denial of attorneys fees. We affirm the Boards order.

The facts as found by the referee are not in dispute. On February 28, 1975, Claimant sustained a work-related…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Poli v. WORK. COMP. APPEAL BOARDCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  2. Smith v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  3. Cleaver v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  4. Cooper-Jarrett, Inc. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  5. Landis v. Zimmerman Motors, Inc.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Ramich v. Worker's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  2. Lemansky v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  3. MacNeill v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  4. Magayna v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  5. North Philadelphia Aviation Center v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API