Legal Opinion

Ortman v. Ortman

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided April 17, 1933No. 207PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HORNBECK, PJ.

The petition in error is grounded upon two propositions:

First: “Said court erred in sustaining demurrer to plaintiff’s reply to the second defense of the answer to said Edward M. Ortman, individually and as the executor of the estate of Albert P. Ortman, deceased.”

Second: “Said judgment was given to the said'Edward M. Ortman when it ought to have been given to said Alva C. Ortman.”

The reply avers that the plaintiff was put into possession of the premises by Albert P. Ortman, deceased, in his lifetime and avers that plaintiff made valuable improvements upon the real estate upon…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bolman v. OverallSupreme Court of Alabama · 1886
  2. Torgerson v. HaugeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Edson v. ParsonsNew York Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Alexander v. CronOhio Court of Appeals · 1932

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Upson v. FitzgeraldTexas Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Young v. LevySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1945
  3. Hathaway v. JonesOhio Court of Appeals · 1934
  4. Ardinger v. BellOhio Court of Appeals · 1934
  5. Himes v. RickmanOhio Court of Appeals · 1934

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API