Legal Opinion

Himes v. Rickman

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided April 18, 1934No. 340PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*576OPINION

By HORNBECK, PJ.

The brief of plaintiffs in error asserts and urges three grounds of error: (1) That the petition was demurrable as it failed to state a cause of action. (2). The verdict was not sustained by reason of failure of evidence as to the value of the services rendered. (3). The verdict is excessive and manifestly against the weight of the evidence.

It is urged by the defendant that, inasmuch as the oral contract set forth in the petition was voidable under the statute of frauds and defendant elected to void it, it could not properly be set out as a basis for any recovery…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Ortman v. OrtmanOhio Court of Appeals · 1933

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. McDonaldOhio Court of Appeals · 1970
  2. Stupp v. LearOhio Court of Appeals · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API