Legal Opinion

Hathaway v. Jones

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided March 12, 1934No. 557PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By RICHARDS, J.

The fourth amended petition and the evidence disclose that the value of the services contracted for was intended to be and was easily susceptible of being valued in money, and in such cases the principle of law is as stated in Newbold v Michael, 110 Oh St, 588, that specific performance of an oral contract for services to be in part compensate^ for by a transfer of real estate. will not lie unless a fraud would result by such refusal. That case was followed by this court, and a similar conclusion announced in Nunn v Boal, 29 Oh Ap, 141, (6 Abs 148). In the latter case…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ortman v. OrtmanOhio Court of Appeals · 1933
  2. Nunn v. BoalOhio Court of Appeals · 1928
  3. Ringler v. BenedictOhio Court of Appeals · 1933

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. McCraw v. LlewellynSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  2. Young v. LevySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1945
  3. Busque v. MarcouSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1952
  4. Kessler v. OlenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Gilbert v. GilbertNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API