Legal Opinion

Ardinger v. Bell

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided May 3, 1934No. 331PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*439OPINION

By BARNES, J.

Counsel for the respective parties in. then-briefs seem to be at variance as to whether or not the general demurrer invokes the statute of frauds or the statute, of limitations.

We shall .have in mind both statutes in arriving at our conclusion. . .

The petition fails to state the- amount, nature or character of the estate left by Mr. and Mrs. Springstein. As against a general demurrer .we do not think this omissi.on is vital.

The Supreme Court of Ohio has definitely and unequivocally held that an oral agreement to leave real property to another by will or otherwise in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ortman v. OrtmanOhio Court of Appeals · 1933
  2. Struble, Admr. v. StrubleOhio Court of Appeals · 1932

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. McCarthy, Lebit, Crystal & Haiman Co. v. First Union Management, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. Sabin v. GravesOhio Court of Appeals · 1993
  3. In re Estate of ButlerOhio Court of Appeals · 1939
  4. Stupp v. LearOhio Court of Appeals · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API