Legal Opinion

Alexander v. Cron

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided January 6, 1932No. 276PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHornbeck, J.

Much of the evidence is offered to support either the claim of compliance by plaintiff with her contract, as stated, or the defense of non-compliance.

The plaintiff was precluded from testifying and in consequence there is not that continuity of proof which would be expected if she were permitted to take the stand. However, it is testified, and not denied, that plaintiff was with Emeline for weeks before she was taken to the hospital when she and Marcia were sick at the same time; that she quit her job to do this work. No record evidence from the factory at which she worked is offered to…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Wilber v. PaineOhio Supreme Court · 1824

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ortman v. OrtmanOhio Court of Appeals · 1933
  2. Mossholder v. WigginsOhio Court of Appeals · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API