Legal Opinion
Lakey v. Remington Arms Co.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided May 10, 1989No. Nos. 88-1860, 88-2058PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MAGILL, Circuit Judge.
The question before us is whether the district court1 was correct in granting the motion of Remington Arms Company, Inc. (RAC) for summary judgment.2 This litigation arose from an employer’s refusal to grant its employees severance pay when it was immediately succeeded by another federal contractor. The employees did not suffer a lack of work as a result of the change in management. Under new standards recently enunciated by the United States Supreme Court in Firestone Tire and Rubber Co. v. Bruch, — U.S. -, 109 S.Ct. 948, 103 L.Ed.2d 80 (1989), we affirm.
I
Appellants…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- James W. Sly and Schorling Schneider on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated v. P.R. Mallory & Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
- Pabst Brewing Co. v. Leo J. AngerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
- Bruch v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1986
- Pabst Brewing Co. v. AngerDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1985
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Ralph Block v. Pitney Bowes Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1992
- Leilani Exbom v. Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Health and Welfare FundCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
- Eileen Moon, Individually and as of the Estate of R. Byron Moon, Cross-Appellant v. American Home Assurance Company, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989
- Reichelt v. Emhart Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
- Howe v. Varity Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.