Legal Opinion

James W. Sly and Schorling Schneider on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated v. P.R. Mallory & Company, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided July 29, 1983No. 82-2997PublishedCited by 93 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JAMESON, Senior District Judge.

Plaintiffs-appellants, James W. Sly and Schorling Schneider, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, brought this action against defendant-appellee, P.R. Mallory, Inc. (Mallory) seeking recovery of severance pay and other benefits as a result of their terminations of employment by Mallory. They appeal from a judgment dismissing their complaint following cross-motions for summary judgment. We affirm.

I. Factual Background

On March 24, 1975, Mallory adopted a written “severance policy for salaried employees”, which was applicable to all divisions of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Claude Wardle, Sr. v. Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension FundCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1980
  2. James J. Reiherzer v. Daniel J. Shannon, and Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension FundCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1978
  3. Pinto v. Zenith Radio Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1979
  4. Billy Matthews v. Swift and Company and Globe Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
  5. Pinto v. Zenith Radio CorpCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1980

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by93 opinions

  1. Blau v. Del Monte Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
  2. Harry Jung, Individually and on Behalf of All Other Persons Similarly Situated v. Fmc Corporation, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  3. Albert Van Boxel, Cross-Appellee v. The Journal Company Employees' Pension Trust, CrossCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
  4. Nick Russo v. Health, Welfare & Pension Fund, Local 705, International Brotherhood of TeamstersCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
  5. David E. Blakeman and Harold D. Keeble v. Mead ContainersCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985

88 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API