Pabst Brewing Co. v. Anger
District Court, D. Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM & ORDER
DEVITT, District Judge.
The court has considered the parties’ memoranda and supporting exhibits and affidavits, the arguments of counsel, and all of the files, records and proceedings in the case.
Plaintiff filed this action after receiving and denying claims for severance benefits following the exchange of its Saint Paul brewery for a Stroh’s brewery in Tampa, Florida. The individual defendants were salaried, non-union employees of Pabst before the exchange, and hired by Stroh’s at the time of the exchange. The individual defendants were never unemployed as a result of the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Donovan v. DillinghamCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982
- Blau v. Del Monte Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- James W. Sly and Schorling Schneider on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated v. P.R. Mallory & Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
- Dhayer v. Weirton Steel Division of National Steel Corp.District Court, N.D. West Virginia · 1983
3Cited by22 opinions
- Clyde Simmons and Lloyd Cole v. Diamond Shamrock Corporation, A/K/A Diamond Shamrock Chemicals CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1988
- Lakey v. Remington Arms Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1989
- Pabst Brewing Co. v. Leo J. AngerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
- Coleman v. General Electric Co.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1986
- Acton v. Tosco Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.