Legal Opinion

Pabst Brewing Co. v. Leo J. Anger

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided February 21, 1986No. 85-5222PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an action for declaratory judgment brought by Pabst Brewing Company against certain of its former employees. Pabst seeks a declaration that it does not owe the defendants severance pay. Defendants worked at a brewery in St. Paul, Minnesota, which Pabst had acquired in 1982 from Olympia Brewing Co. As part of the acquisition agreement, Pabst agreed to abide by Olympia’s Separation From Employment Policy (SFEP) until March 18, 1984. Later, Pabst transferred the brewery to Stroh Brewery Company in exchange for a Stroh’s brewery in Tampa, Florida. Stroh’s agreed to continue the Olympia…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Pabst Brewing Co. v. AngerDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1985

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Robert W. Heidgerd v. Olin CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
  2. Bruch v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
  3. Bruch v. Firestone Tire And Rubber CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
  4. Clyde Simmons and Lloyd Cole v. Diamond Shamrock Corporation, A/K/A Diamond Shamrock Chemicals CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1988
  5. Lakey v. Remington Arms Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1989

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API