Legal Opinion

Ott v. Press Publishing Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 29, 1905No. 5679PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Spokane county, Iíuneke, J., entered February 13, 1905, upon the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the defendant, in an action for libel.

1Opinion of the CourtCrow, J.

Appellants, who are husband and wife, were, on April 12, 1904, and for some time prior thereto had been, engaged in the business of conducting an employment agency in the city of Spokane. On said date respondent, being the owner and publisher of the Spokane Press, a daily newspaper in said city, published an article relative to appellants’ business, which article they claimed to be libelous, and this action was brought to recover damages resulting therefrom. It would not serve any needful purpose to reproduce the article in this opinion. The trial court held the words therein contained, if…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Spokane Truck & Dray Co. v. HoeferWashington Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Davis v. Tacoma Railway & Power Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Hartung v. WitteWisconsin Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Levy v. Fleischner, Mayer & Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Haynes v. Spokane Chronicle Publishing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1895

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Haysom v. Coleman Lantern Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Anderson v. Pantages Theatre Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Corcoran v. Postal Telegraph-Cable Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Brink v. GriffithWashington Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Farrar v. Tribune Publishing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1961

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API