Dayley v. City of Burley
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
524 P.2d 1073 (1974)
96 Idaho 101
Ardell DAYLEY et al., Plaintiffs-Respondents,
v.
CITY OF BURLEY, Idaho, a municipal corporation, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 11212.
Supreme Court of Idaho.
July 22, 1974.
William A. Parsons, Parsons & Smith, Burley, for defendant-appellant.
Donald J. Chisholm, Goodman, Duff & Chisholm, Rupert, for plaintiffs-respondents.
McFADDEN, Justice.
The plaintiff-respondents, Ardell Dayley and Max Dayley with their wives, instituted this quiet title action against the City of Burley and other defendants. The claims of all defendants other than the city were settled and are not…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited13 opinions
- LEVENE ET UX. v. City of SalemOregon Supreme Court · 1951
- Hutchinson v. Watson Slough Ditch Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1909
- Loosli v. HesemanIdaho Supreme Court · 1945
- Youngblood v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- Harper v. JohannesenIdaho Supreme Court · 1962
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.