Legal Opinion

Dayley v. City of Burley

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided July 22, 1974No. 11212Published

1Opinion of the Court

524 P.2d 1073 (1974)

96 Idaho 101

Ardell DAYLEY et al., Plaintiffs-Respondents,

v.

CITY OF BURLEY, Idaho, a municipal corporation, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 11212.

Supreme Court of Idaho.

July 22, 1974.

William A. Parsons, Parsons & Smith, Burley, for defendant-appellant.

Donald J. Chisholm, Goodman, Duff & Chisholm, Rupert, for plaintiffs-respondents.

McFADDEN, Justice.

The plaintiff-respondents, Ardell Dayley and Max Dayley with their wives, instituted this quiet title action against the City of Burley and other defendants. The claims of all defendants other than the city were settled and are not…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. LEVENE ET UX. v. City of SalemOregon Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Hutchinson v. Watson Slough Ditch Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Loosli v. HesemanIdaho Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Youngblood v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  5. Harper v. JohannesenIdaho Supreme Court · 1962

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API