Legal Opinion

Jackson v. Jackson

California Supreme Court

Decided August 11, 1967No. S. F. 22379PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.

This is an appeal by plaintiff-husband in what was originally an annulment suit from the order of the trial court denying a motion to cancel all previous orders by which he was directed to pay attorney’s fees, maintenance, and court costs.

Facts: Plaintiff, aged 21, and defendant were married in Nevada on November 9, 1964. They returned to California to live. On the morning of November 13, less than four days after the marriage ceremony, plaintiff discovered that his wife had left him. They have had no contact since that date.

Plaintiff filed suit for annulment in the Superior Court of San…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kusior v. SilverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  2. McNamara v. McNamaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Estate of WalkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Estate of Marshall v. Security-First National BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  5. Wareham v. WarehamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. People v. DillonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Ortiz v. PeñaSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1979
  3. In Re L.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1970
  4. S. D. W. v. HoldenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  5. Stephen B. v. Sharyne B.California Court of Appeal · 1981

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API