Legal Opinion

Estate of Marshall v. Security-First National Bank

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 22, 1953No. Civ. 19492PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhite, P. J.

This is an appeal by Lorraine Bridges Marshall, guardian of the person of Diane Marshall, a minor, from a decree in an heirship proceeding.

The factual background surrounding this litigation may be thus epitomized. John Ridgely Marshall, Jr., died testate on January 27, 1950. In his will he failed to mention Sharon Bunn, a minor, hereinafter referred to as 11 Sharon. ’ ’ In the aforesaid heirship proceeding before the superior court, sitting in probate, it was decreed and adjudged that Sharon was the legitimate daughter of decedent. An appeal from such decree is prosecuted by Diane Marshall, a…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Tupman v. HaberkernCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  2. McNamara v. McNamaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Berry v. ChaplinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  4. Estate of PlautCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Estate of SchluttigCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Kusior v. SilverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Estate of HormanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Jackson v. JacksonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Estate of NeilsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  5. Daniels v. DanielsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API