Legal Opinion
Norwalk Tire & Rubber Co. v. Manufacturers' Casualty Insurance
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided March 5, 1929PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBanks, J.
The appeal claims a correction of the finding in many respects, including a request that there be added to the finding all but four of the twenty-eight paragraphs of the draft-finding. A claim that the court should have found substantially the whole of the draft-finding can rarely be made in good faith and violates our rules' as well as good practice. Gallaher v. Southern New England Telephone Co., 99 Conn. 282, 290, 121 Atl. 686. There was no motion to correct the finding, and none is required when, as here, the appellant is proceeding under § 5832 of the General Statutes, but the most…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- White v. Connecticut Fire InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1876
- Hartford-Connecticut Trust Co. v. CambellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1922
- Huggins Cracker & Candy Co. v. People's InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1890
- Gallaher v. Southern New , England Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1923
- Pelican Assurance Co. v. SchildknechtCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1908
3Cited by10 opinions
- Truslow Fulle, Inc. v. Diamond Bottling CorporationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
- MacE v. Conde Nast Publications, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
- Tiernan v. Savin Rock Realty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
- Pelaggi Co. v. Orient Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1930
- Spicer v. SpicerConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.