Legal Opinion
MacE v. Conde Nast Publications, Inc.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided December 19, 1967PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAlcorn, J.
Twenty former employees of the defendant and the executrix of a deceased former employee brought this action seeking to recover, under their employment contract with the defendant, severance pay with interest, which they claimed was due them and unpaid since the termination of their employment on April 1, 1961. The defendant’s answer admitted only that the plaintiffs were employees to and including March 31, 1961. In addition, the defendant pleaded six special defenses, alleging, severally, an accord and satisfaction, a novation, waiver, estoppel, laches, and the Statute of Limitations. The…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Adams v. Jersey Central Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1956
- Riverside Coal Co. v. American Coal Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1927
- State v. MalletteSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1966
- Wooster v. Wm. C. A. Fischer Plumbing & Heating Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1966
- Willets v. Emhart Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1965
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Harry Jung, Individually and on Behalf of All Other Persons Similarly Situated v. Fmc Corporation, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Dahl v. Brunswick Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1976
- State v. TropianoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
- Bruch v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
- Bruch v. Firestone Tire And Rubber CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.