Legal Opinion
Gallaher v. Southern New , England Telephone Co.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided July 27, 1923PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWheeler, C. J.
The first seven reasons of appeal are, in effect, that the Public Utilities Commission erred in deciding that the service rendered and the rates charged the petitioner were neither unreasonable» nor discriminatory, but in fact were reasonable, and in not taking into consideration the character, quality and adequacy of the service in making its decision; and in holding that it was not discriminatory and unreasonable for the defendant to impose an additional mileage charge on subscribers for a single-line service and not on subscribers for party-line service.
The petition was brought under…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Ohio Valley Water Co. v. Ben Avon BoroughSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Modeste v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1922
- Root v. New Britain Gas Light Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1916
3Cited by9 opinions
- Pennsylvania-Dixie Cement Corp. v. H. Wales Lines Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
- Staff v. HawkinsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1949
- Steele v. Clinton Electric Light & Power Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1937
- Bilton Machine Tool Co. v. United Illuminating Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
- Tiernan v. Savin Rock Realty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.