Legal Opinion
Bode v. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided June 1, 2000No. C1-98-2200PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PAUL H. ANDERSON, Justice.
In 1998, following 18 years of legal and administrative proceedings, appellants Judy and Linda Bode asserted that a 1986 Nicollet County District Court judgment was void because a 1980 appeal from an administrative hearing was filed one day late. In that subsequent and separate district court action, the Bodes made a motion under Minn. R. Civ. P. 60.02(d), arguing that the district court’s 1986 judgment was void because the 1980 appeal by respondent Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR) had been untimely. The Bodes asked the court to vacate its prior…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Robert James Lubben v. Selective Service System Local Board No. 27Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1972
- State v. LothenbachSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Gary McDougald Cross-Appellant v. Vivian L. Jenson, Cross-Appellee, Clarence Ehli, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1986
- Jennifer N. Kocher Darlene Kocher Carl Kocher v. Dow Chemical Company E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
- In Re Marriage of MitchellIllinois Supreme Court · 1998
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Davis v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 2008
- Real Estate Equity Strategies, LLC v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006
- Langston v. Wilson McShane Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
- Beaulieu v. Minnesota Department of Human ServicesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2011
- Commissioner of Natural Resources v. Nicollet County Public Water/Wetlands Hearings UnitCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.