In Re the Speed Limit for the Union Pacific Railroad Ex Rel. City of Shakopee
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KALITOWSKI, Judge.
Relator Union Pacific Railroad challenges the authority of the Commissioner of the Minnesota Department of Transportation to impose a ten-miles-per-hour speed limit along a one-mile segment of its track in downtown Shakopee. Union Pacific argues that: (1) because the state’s ability to regulate train speed is preempted by federal regulations promulgated under the Federal Railroad Safety Act (FRSA), 49 U.S.C. §§ 20101-21311 (1994), the FRSA’s savings clause under 49 U.S.C. § 20106 does not apply; and (2) even if the savings clause applies to the regulation of train…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- CSX Transportation, Inc. v. EasterwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Katzenbach v. McClungSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Ray v. Atlantic Richfield Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Honn v. City of Coon RapidsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- Sorenson v. St. Paul Ramsey Medical CenterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Duluth, Winnipeg, & Pacific Railway Co. v. City of OrrCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
- Largo v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2001
- Largo v. ATCHISON, TOPEKA AND SANTA FE RY.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2001
- Stevenson v. Union Pacific RailroadDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 2000
- Thul v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.