Legal Opinion

In Re the Speed Limit for the Union Pacific Railroad Ex Rel. City of Shakopee

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided July 7, 2000No. C1-99-1722PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KALITOWSKI, Judge.

Relator Union Pacific Railroad challenges the authority of the Commissioner of the Minnesota Department of Transportation to impose a ten-miles-per-hour speed limit along a one-mile segment of its track in downtown Shakopee. Union Pacific argues that: (1) because the state’s ability to regulate train speed is preempted by federal regulations promulgated under the Federal Railroad Safety Act (FRSA), 49 U.S.C. §§ 20101-21311 (1994), the FRSA’s savings clause under 49 U.S.C. § 20106 does not apply; and (2) even if the savings clause applies to the regulation of train…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. CSX Transportation, Inc. v. EasterwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Katzenbach v. McClungSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Ray v. Atlantic Richfield Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Honn v. City of Coon RapidsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  5. Sorenson v. St. Paul Ramsey Medical CenterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Duluth, Winnipeg, & Pacific Railway Co. v. City of OrrCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
  2. Largo v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2001
  3. Largo v. ATCHISON, TOPEKA AND SANTA FE RY.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2001
  4. Stevenson v. Union Pacific RailroadDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 2000
  5. Thul v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API