Legal Opinion
State v. R.M.H.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided August 24, 2000No. C0-99-559PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*57OPINION
PAUL H. ANDERSON, Justice.
The issue before us is whether the State of Minnesota has jurisdiction to enforce its speeding and driver’s license laws against an Indian who commits these offenses on a state highway located on the reservation of a tribe of which the Indian is not an enrolled member. The district court concluded that Minnesota does have jurisdiction over an Indian who is not an enrolled member of the tribe on whose reservation the offenses occurred. The Minnesota Court of Appeals reversed, concluding that federal law does not distinguish between tribes and reservations in…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- United States v. WheelerSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. MazurieSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- White Mountain Apache Tribe v. BrackerSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Cherokee Nation v. State of GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1831
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- State v. BusseSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
- State v. SimionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
- State v. JonesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
- State v. DavisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
- People ex rel. Becerra v. Rose, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.