Legal Opinion
M. B. Zaninovich, Inc. v. Agricultural Labor Relations Board
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 15, 1981No. Civ. 4472PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FRANSON, J.
Statement of the Case
On August 25, 1976, real party in interest United Farm Workers (UFW) filed an unfair labor practice charge against petitioner. Thereafter, a complaint was issued by the board’s regional director alleging that on or about August 11, 1976, petitioner “established, implemented and otherwise enforced a discriminatory hiring policy which was designed to and did in fact result in the refusal to. ..rehire workers because of their participation in settlement proceedings with the board and their support of and activities on behalf of the UFW.” Such activity was…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Republic Aviation Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- National Labor Relations Board v. Erie Resistor Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1963
- National Labor Relations Board v. Seven-Up Bottling Co. of Miami, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1953
- National Labor Relations Board v. Great Dane Trailers, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Nish Noroian Farms v. Agricultural Labor Relations Bd.California Supreme Court · 1984
- Superior Farming Co. v. Agricultural Labor Relations BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- Nash-DeCamp Co. v. Agricultural Labor Relations BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- M. B. Zaninovich, Inc. v. Agricultural Labor Relations BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981