Legal Opinion
Nash-DeCamp Co. v. Agricultural Labor Relations Board
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 16, 1983No. Civ. 7045PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
WOOLPERT, J.
This court must decide whether pursuit of an alleged recent underpayment in the checks of an employee and his wife constitute protected “concerted activity” for the purpose of mutual aid or protection as defined in Labor Code section 1152 and protected under Labor Code section 1153, subdivision (a). After having extensively researched case authority in this area under the California Agricultural Labor Relations Act, the National Labor Relations Act and the federal circuits, we hold that under the particular facts of this case, such action is not concerted activity.
The…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- National Labor Relations Board v. J. Weingarten, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- National Labor Relations Board v. Washington Aluminum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Tex-Cal Land Management, Inc. v. Agricultural Labor Relations BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Bertuccio v. Agricultural Labor Relations BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
- Coastal Berry Co. v. Agricultural Labor Relations BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- United Farm Wkrs. of America v. Agricultural Labor Rel. Bd.California Court of Appeal · 1993