Legal Opinion

State v. Sweeney

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 12, 2003No. 010342410, A115028PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*257KISTLER, J.

Defendant appeals from a judgment of conviction for second-degree trespass. He argues that the court erred in denying his motion for judgment of acquittal. We reverse.

Defendant received multiple orders excluding him from being on Tri-Met property. On March 4,2001, a Tri-Met officer saw defendant arriving on a westbound MAX train. When defendant saw the officer, he jumped off the train and started running away from the officer and toward the elevators at the MAX station. Before defendant could get away, the officer stopped and arrested him for violating the exclusion orders. After…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ailes v. Portland Meadows, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1991
  2. State v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  3. State v. JuryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  4. State v. CollinsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  5. Azorr v. AzorrCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. ReynoldsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  2. State v. SweeneyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  3. State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API