Legal Opinion

Azorr v. Azorr

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 5, 2002No. 00-02760; A112849PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, P. J.

Petitioners SAIF Corporation and Oregon Health Sciences University (employer, collectively) seek reversal of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board, in which the board assessed penalties against employer under ORS 656.262(ll)(a) for its refusal to process claimant’s new medical condition claim under ORS 656.262(7)(c). Employer contends that, although there was a prior decision of the board and two rulings by this court that established employer’s obligation to process claimant’s claim as requested, it had a legitimate doubt as to its liability and therefore was not subject to penalties…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Brown v. Argonaut Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  2. Norgard v. Rawlinsons & New System LaundryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
  3. Westfall v. Rust International & Underwriters Adjusting Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1992
  4. International Paper Co. v. HuntleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  5. Johansen v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1999

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Providence Health System v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  2. State v. SweeneyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  3. Liberty Northwest Insurance v. Olvera-ChavezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  4. In Re The Estate Of Robert Carlton GilkeyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020
  5. State v. SweeneyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API