Legal Opinion

State v. Holliday

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 8, 1992No. 89CR2847; CA A64009PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJoseph, C. J.

Defendant appeals his convictions and sentences for the crimes of being an ex-convict in possession of a firearm, ORS 166.270, and theft by receiving. ORS 164.055.

The trial court denied defendant’s motion in limine to exclude all references to his 1976 conviction for sodomy. He argues that the denial was error, because the state failed to prove that his guilty plea on that charge was counseled. A defendant who challenges the constitutionality of a prior conviction on that ground bears the burden of demonstrating prima facie that the conviction was uncounseled. If that is done, the burden is…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. MoellerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  2. State v. MoellerOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  3. State v. GrenvikOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  4. State v. CookCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  5. State v. MarshCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. ProbstOregon Supreme Court · 2005
  2. State v. GravesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  3. State v. ProbstCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
  4. State v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  5. State v. RigginsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API