Legal Opinion

Minor v. Minor

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 22, 1950No. 456PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEsviN, J.

Under the allegations of the complaint, the judicial admissions of the defendants at the trial, and the answers to the first and second issues, the plaintiffs were entitled to have the court reform the deed by inserting in it the omitted agreement of the parties requiring the male defendant to support the plaintiffs for the remainder of their lives. Cuthbertson v. Morgan, 149 N.C. 72, 62 S.E. 744. Instead of entering a judgment of reformation, however, the court decreed that the conveyance should be canceled in its entirety. The defendants challenge the propriety .of this action by an…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Hall v. . QuinnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  2. Gardner v. KnightSupreme Court of Alabama · 1899
  3. Helms v. Helms.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
  4. Shannonhouse v. . WolfeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  5. Brittain v. . TaylorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Norwood v. CarterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  2. Davis v. DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  3. Bowen v. DardenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  4. Gadsden v. JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  5. Mills v. DunkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API