Legal Opinion · Dissent

Helms v. Helms.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 26, 1904PublishedCited by 22 opinions

ActioNS by W. L. Helms against Henry Helms and others, beard by Judge II. B. Bryan and a jury, at February Term, 1904, of the Superior Court of Union County. Erom a judgment for the plaintiff the defendants appealed.

1DissentClark, C. J.

Elmira Helms being the owner of an undivided one-sixth interest in the locus in quo, executed a deed on August 14, 1897, to William L. Helms, conveying such interest to him in (165) consideration of "One dollar to her paid by William L. Helms, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, and the further consideration of the support during the natural life of the party of the first part." Following the covenant of warranty are these words: "And it is further understood and agreed between the parties that the above lands shall stand good for the support and maintenance of the said Elmira Helms…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Gallaher v. HerbertIllinois Supreme Court · 1886
  2. McCardle v. KennedySupreme Court of Georgia · 1893
  3. Allen v. . AllenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1897
  4. Studdard v. WellsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1894
  5. Gray v. . WestSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1885

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Crawford v. . WilloughbySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  2. Brittain v. TaylorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
  3. Hinton v. . VinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1920
  4. Brittain v. . TaylorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
  5. Cook v. . SinkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API