Legal Opinion

Hall v. . Quinn

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 21, 1925PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAdams, J.

It is necessary to keep in mind certain clauses in the deed executed in 1897 by Henry Farrior and James W. Blount to the trustees of the James Sprunt Institute. In the premises it is said that the grantors desired to establish and provide for this institution, which was a high school in the town of Kenansville, and that the Wilmington Presbytery had elected trustees by whom it was to be managed and controlled. Following the premises is the clause of conveyance to the “trustees and their successors in trust for the Wilmington Presbytery to be used for the purposes of education.” And then the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Braddy v. . ElliottSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
  2. Louisville & Frankfort Railroad v. BallardCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1859
  3. Saint Peter's Church v. BragawSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
  4. Brittain v. TaylorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
  5. Hinton v. . VinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1920

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Atlantic-Pacific Oil Co. v. Gas Development Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Shannonhouse v. . WolfeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  3. Station Associates, Inc. v. Dare CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1999
  4. Young Women's Christian Ass'n of Asheville v. MorganSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  5. Brittain v. . TaylorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API