Bowen v. Darden
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtBabNHill, J.
The complaint is an extended and somewhat laborious recital of numerous events, facts, and circumstances. Occurrences both before and after the execution of the deed under attack are detailed at some length. This prolixity renders it difficult, if not impossible, for us to ferret out with any degree of certainty the exact nature of the cause of action plaintiff seeks to allege. On the argument here her counsel was unable to give us any assistance in this respect. Jackson v. Hodges, Comr. of Insurance, 232 N.C. 694.
If she seeks to reform the deed, then the grantors are necessary parties. If…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hussey v. Norfolk Southern RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1887
- Whichard v. LipeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
- Hunt v. EureSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
- Whichard v. . LipeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
- Hunt v. . EureSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Norwood v. CarterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
- Wilkins v. Commercial Finance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- Brevard v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
- Wynne v. AllenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
- Messick v. TurnageSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.