Legal Opinion

Mills v. Dunk

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 24, 1965No. 110PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSharp, J.

Defendants’ assignments of error, properly made, present one question only, the sufficiency of the evidence to withstand their motions for judgment as of nonsuit. In this Court, however, they demur ore terms to the complaint on the ground that it contains no allegation that at the time defendants made their promise to support plaintiff for life, and thereby secured from her a deed to the property described in the complaint, they did not intend to perform the agreement.

If we construe the complaint liberally in plaintiff’s favor, it sufficiently alleges fraud in the treaty, i.e., that, in order…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  2. Cowart v. HoneycuttSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  3. Gadsden v. JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  4. Minor v. MinorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  5. Higgins v. . HigginsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Bryan Builders Supply v. MidyetteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  2. Green v. CondraNorth Carolina Business Court · 2009
  3. Northwestern Bank v. RosemanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  4. Maurer v. Slickedit, Inc.North Carolina Business Court · 2005
  5. Lawson v. BentonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API