Legal Opinion
Securities & Exchange Commission v. Seahawk Deep Ocean Technology, Inc.
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided February 13, 1996No. Civil No. 3:95MC451(DJS)PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON MOTION TO QUASH SUBPOENA
SMITH, United States Magistrate Judge.
The movant, Robert Samek (“Samek”), filed this miscellaneous action seeking to quash a subpoena served upon him in connection with a matter pending in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida. See Securities and Exchange Commission v. Seahawk Deep Ocean Technology, Inc., Civil No. 94-1249-CIV-T-178 (M.D.Fla.). The movant, a reporter, is a non-party in the underlying Florida litigation and argues that the deposition subpoena served upon him by the plaintiff, the Securities and Exchange Commission…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Branzburg v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- von Bulow v. von BulowCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- Charles Baker v. F & F InvestmentCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
- United States v. James Burke, Anthony Perla, Rocco Perla, and Richard KuhnCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Albert Gonzales and Mary Gonzales, Deputy Darrell Pierce v. National Broadcasting Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- Goldberg v. Amgen, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- In re Natural Gas Commodity LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2005
- State v. RogersSuperior Court of Delaware · 2003
- United States v. TreacyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2009
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.