Legal Opinion

State v. Morry

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided July 10, 1992No. S-4632, S-4660PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Before RABINOWITZ, C.J., and BURKE, MATTHEWS, COMPTON, and MOORE, JJ. RABINOWITZ, Chief Justice.

INTRODUCTION

Alaska’s big game tag regulation requires a brown bear hunter to purchase a numbered, nontransferable tag before hunting and then, after taking a bear, affix and keep the tag on the animal until it is stored, consumed, or exported from the state. 5 AAC 92.012(c). Brown bear sealing regulations require that a hunter keep the skin and skull of a bear if taken in certain game management units, and within thirty days, have a state official stamp a seal on these parts. At sealing, the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Kelly v. ZamarelloAlaska Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Peninsula Marketing Ass'n v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
  3. McDowell v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Peter Pan Seafoods, Inc. v. StepanoffAlaska Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Madison v. Alaska Department of Fish & GameAlaska Supreme Court · 1985

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Totemoff v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1995
  2. State v. Kenaitze Indian TribeAlaska Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Alaska Fish & Wildlife Conservation Fund v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2015
  4. Payton v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Alaska Fish & Wildlife Conservation Fund v. State, Department of Fish & Game, Board of FisheriesAlaska Supreme Court · 2012

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API